Mr. Chairman, I can understand now why the amendment was offered, because there are a number of mistakes with respect to the facts. The gentleman mentioned that Chief Reyes, Silvester Reyes, who is by far the most famous Border Patrol chief in this country because he actually did something in terms of stemming the tide and holding the line in El Paso, was represented by a San Diego Union editorial writer as being opposed to the fence. After he testified before the Subcommittee on Immigration and Claims of the Committee on the Judiciary, he stated that, if you had sufficient agencies and you had a triple fence, you could indeed stop illegal immigration. When I sent the editorial that the gentleman just read and another editorial to Silvester Reyes, he responded with a corrective letter to the newspaper admonishing them not to misrepresent his position. His position just a couple of days ago was this: As a former chief of the El Paso Border Patrol sector, I testified last year before Congress on our efforts to control illegal immigration in the El Paso area.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the effectiveness of border security measures during a committee hearing.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
But let me register my objection to the Rules Committee's determination that one of the amendments that I had offered was not made in order, and that is the amendment that goes to the so-called tanker deal. Let me just explain to my…
we are in the middle of a war in which the battlefield situation changes on a daily basis. The idea that the gentleman has given us a requirement for the administration to project until 2068, for 50, 60 years as to what is going to happen…
A couple of years ago when our guys started to get hurt with roadside bombs in Iraq, we realized that there were no jammers to jam those electronic signals that detonate the 155 rounds that were blowing up American Marines and soldiers, no…
That would have meant jobs for the American workers, and it would have meant that we kept a lot of that talent pool, that industrial base capability, in the United States. This would have been a huge win for American workers and it would…





