Let me explain why I do not agree that the Spratt budget is the best budget. It is true that we can take more money out of what I would call the operational military, and that is the side of the military from which ammunition, readiness, present operations in Iraq and Afghanistan are funded; and we can move it over to the nonoperational military and give more benefits on that side. The problem with that is that that amounts to a reduction in the operational military. We have a top line, and that top line is not expanded by the Spratt budget, and that means that the people who are retired, who have great affection for this country and have every right to be treated well by this Nation, also have another interest, and that interest is to see that the people who are in the arena today, in the battlefield today, get every single thing that they can possibly have focused on that battlefield and have those resources focused on that battlefield.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Spratt budget on military funding during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Taking back my time, I don't think we are going to be appropriating any melting shirts, or authorizing any melting shirts. We do serious stuff. And when you have a defense bill which is over $500 billion and it has thousands and thousands…
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.
My friends, this is the age of missiles. The people that we listen to so carefully in our hearings are the combatant commanders. Those are the guys who are in charge of running military operations in the case of an attack on the United…
Let me just say to my friend, I believe in disclosure. That is why I put every initiative on the Internet. I think you have got to disclose things and you have got to be able to be accountable for those things. I think that's absolutely…





