I too look forward to a robust debate on the B-2 bomber, and I think it is our duty to force as many colleagues as we can to listen to us one more time on that issue. I want to assure my colleague that it is my desire to have a robust debate, especially on the B-2 issue, and I know the depot issue is one that has a lot of claimants and will have a great deal of debate offered. If we can get an extra hour or two on Tuesday morning from the leadership and maybe push that other issue up a little bit, we can have a more robust debate on B-2, Bosnia and the depot issue.
Andrew P. Hunter: “I too look forward to a robust debate on the B-2 bomber, and I think it is our duty to force as many colleagues as we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a robust debate on the B-2 bomber and related issues.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
It is concerning; and, of course, it fits a pattern, a long-term pattern of efforts by China to obtain intellectual property and technology from the United States.
You cannot throw money at the problem, and we do not need to be investing government dollars where the private sector is going to invest its own dollars.
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.





