Let me ask the gentleman further, because we are going to have this thing sorted out before this bill is over. Is it the gentleman's contention that the Marine Corps' position is they understand that they can use that beach and they simply have not used it, that that beach is available for amphibious landings? Did the gentleman ask the Marines? That is my question, I guess.
Questioning the understanding of the Marine Corps regarding beach availability for amphibious landings.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
It is my belief that, collectively, NATO is not yet at a maturity level sufficient to effectively incorporate cyber technologies that exploit critical Russian infrastructure.
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.
Other voices in this conversation
