I hope that this is the start of a bipartisan effort to put together a defense bill in the coming year which is adequate to serve our country's needs. Let me just tell my colleagues that from my perspective, and I heard the gentleman from California (Mr. Cunningham) make a number of very, very good points with respect to inadequacies, I think we are about $50 billion short, and I think all of the studies that we have done, such as the CBO, which says that our equipment is short-funded about $30 billion a year. That means if we have to replace trucks, tanks, ships, planes, on a steady state just to keep them halfway modern, we need to spend an extra $30 billion a year in the defense area. We are underfunded on munitions.
Andrew P. Hunter: “I hope that this is the start of a bipartisan effort to put together a defense bill in the coming year which is adequate…”
On the recordNovember 28, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for increased defense spending in light of military operations in Afghanistan.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Feb 28, 2017
I think the key is deterrence, because I think the truth is, whether it is the scenario that we looked at, the scenarios war games there, there is no certainty of victory if the Russians make a serious move against the Baltics, at least in…
Feb 28, 2017
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
Feb 11, 2015
You cannot throw money at the problem, and we do not need to be investing government dollars where the private sector is going to invest its own dollars.





