We are going to try to do a lot of things with what we have, with the $18 billion in extra spending that we anticipate this year above and beyond what we call the ``Clinton baseline.'' But that $18 billion, once again, does not come close to solving the equipment problem, which is about a $30-billion-per-year problem, solving the ammunition problems, the people problems, the other problems we have across the board. We are going to do as much as we can.
Andrew P. Hunter: “We are going to try to do a lot of things with what we have, with the $18 billion in extra spending that we anticipate…”
On the recordSeptember 5, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing military spending and equipment issues during a floor speech.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Feb 28, 2017
I think the key is deterrence, because I think the truth is, whether it is the scenario that we looked at, the scenarios war games there, there is no certainty of victory if the Russians make a serious move against the Baltics, at least in…
Feb 28, 2017
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
May 18, 2022
I think competition works well when it is driving innovation, and obviously also can work well to control costs.





