Mr. Speaker, let us make this clear. This is not about some social issue. The real impetus for this barring of the American military from our college campuses is because of the left-wing core of administrators and professors who do not like this country. And we could substitute another protest issue for them in this thing and it would not make a bit of difference. These are the same people who in many cases had protests in favor of the Viet Cong during the Vietnam War. Many of them protested our involvement in El Salvador, protested our bringing democracy to Nicaragua, protested our participation in the first Desert Storm in the early 1990s, and in this recent bringing of freedom to Iraq. They protested all those things. They hate all things military. And the interesting aspect of this debate is that these same left-wing professors and administrators profess to let young people make up their own minds. Free thinking is theoretically their trademark. Let us have some free thinking. Let us allow the military to be on the campuses. Let us allow the students to have access to their information, and let us let them make up their own minds. There is no draft here. This is a volunteer military. They do not have to join the military.
On the recordFebruary 2, 2005
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the presence of the military on college campuses during a debate.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Jan 21, 2009
I rise today because in this last week and next week, we are going to be considering in this Congress spending more than we've ever spent since World War II. With the Troubled Assets Relief Program, otherwise known as TARP, and I like to…
Feb 28, 2017
But we are in a different situation now. And so we have an opportunity to come up with a strategy that is focused on meeting these new challenges, not simply trying to avoid more harm.
May 18, 2022
I think competition works well when it is driving innovation, and obviously also can work well to control costs.
Feb 11, 2015
The government needs to be very discriminating about how it approaches and how it invests its R&D dollars.





