It is obvious from the conversations and statements that have been made here in recent minutes past that this evening's consideration of this particular conference report is surrounded by what I think is an understandable controversy on one issue, and that is of concurrent receipt. The discussions suggests that for the first time in more than 4 decades, passage of a defense conference report is not a foregone conclusion. And given where the Congress, the Nation, and most importantly our military personnel find themselves on this day in history, such a defeat would be a disastrous failure to fulfill our responsibilities at this fateful point in our history. I want the record to show that I consider myself a strong supporter of concurrent receipt.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the controversy surrounding the defense conference report and concurrent receipt.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
Once again, the gentlelady talked about a strategic framework agreement. That does manifest security commitments, and that does have to be ratified. But that is not the Status of Forces Agreement. The Status of Forces Agreement is simply…
Advanced technologies such as UAVs and EW can serve as important force multipliers that improve the effectiveness of current U.S.-European force posture but are by themselves insufficient in tipping the balance.
That would have meant jobs for the American workers, and it would have meant that we kept a lot of that talent pool, that industrial base capability, in the United States. This would have been a huge win for American workers and it would…





