I would say in doing some research into the Gulf War Syndrome and the potential of what I consider to be the actual blow back of agents that went over American troops, that the release of those agents would certainly be considered to be an instrumentality of war, and I think the legislation intends that that is the case.
Discussing Gulf War Syndrome and its implications in relation to legislation.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
It is concerning; and, of course, it fits a pattern, a long-term pattern of efforts by China to obtain intellectual property and technology from the United States.
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
Other voices in this conversation
