I think the gentleman has given an excellent representation of what this dictator does, Mr. Speaker, and what he stands for. I think that builds an excellent context in which we can try to evaluate whether or not peace would work, given a chance. First, he is deceptive. Secondly, I think he believes his future depends on manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. Third, he is willing to take his own people through enormous discomfort and inconvenience and danger in order to achieve his own political ends. But I would say to the gentleman that there are pieces of Saddam Hussein's activities, although maybe not the composite, but it can be fairly said, and it has been said by lots of people, are there not other dictators in the world who do the same thing, and we are not attacking them? I would say that is true. I would say the reason that I think we should move forward, and I think is the major justification for this massive operation, is American security.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the justification for military action against Saddam Hussein.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
I respect the gentleman who just made the statement who has been in Iraq. But my son was in Iraq, also, and on two missions, two tours, and Afghanistan. And one important fact that I think comes out when you talk to folks who have been…
A couple of years ago when our guys started to get hurt with roadside bombs in Iraq, we realized that there were no jammers to jam those electronic signals that detonate the 155 rounds that were blowing up American Marines and soldiers, no…
I rise today because in this last week and next week, we are going to be considering in this Congress spending more than we've ever spent since World War II. With the Troubled Assets Relief Program, otherwise known as TARP, and I like to…





