What we do have is $15.7 billion for DOD. That is $1.7 billion over the President's request. If the gentleman is suggesting that supplemental appropriations bills that come to this floor should never be passed if they have anything extraneous, then he is suggesting something that is very unrealistic, and my recommendation is that if the gentleman looks through this, and we have got money, $7.2 billion for ongoing military operational costs, $4.3 billion for personnel costs, $500 million.
Andrew P. Hunter: “What we do have is $15.7 billion for DOD. That is $1.7 billion over the President's request. If the gentleman is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding for the Department of Defense during a floor debate.
Share
More from Andrew P. Hunter
I think the key is deterrence, because I think the truth is, whether it is the scenario that we looked at, the scenarios war games there, there is no certainty of victory if the Russians make a serious move against the Baltics, at least in…
You cannot throw money at the problem, and we do not need to be investing government dollars where the private sector is going to invest its own dollars.
I think what today's hearing and what this situation and NATO's eastern flank highlights is the fact that we don't have a tremendous amount of time to wait around for the next great Army to show up in 10 to 15 to 20 years.
I think anytime that you have a situation where academic freedom is being constrained, that has real implications for national security.





