If A can prove, however conclusively, that he may of right enslave B, why may not B snatch the same argument and prove equally that he may enslave A?
Editor's note · Context
In a fragment questioning the justifications for slavery, Lincoln uses a rhetorical device to expose the arbitrary nature of claiming a right to enslave another.
Share
More from Abraham Lincoln
Second. That the flag, when raised, be saluted by one hundred guns from Fort Sumter and by a national salute from every fort and rebel battery that fired upon Fort Sumter.
He said, with a great deal of emphasis, and with an expression of countenance I shall never forget: "When a man is sincerely penitent for his misdeeds, and gives satisfactory evidence of the same, he can safely be pardoned, and there is no…
the President directs that from and after this date the order above referred to requiring passports shall be modified, and so much thereof as relates to persons entering this country from Canada shall be rescinded, saving and reserving the…
Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish.





