Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Speaker, I wish to rise and offer a few facts. You know, there's been a lot of opinion going around here today, and we're all entitled to our own opinion, but we're not entitled to our own facts. President Obama famously said: ``If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan, period.'' The Congressional Budget Office released the fact that 20 million people are expected to lose their health insurance coverage if this law stands--20 million Americans who currently have health insurance will lose it under this plan: Fact. Why? Because of bad provisions in the bill. Seventy-one out of the Fortune 100 companies will save $422 billion by eliminating their employer-provided coverage and opt instead to pay the $2,000 per-employee penalty instead. It incentivizes bad behavior, precisely the opposite of the stated goal. Another claim the President repeated was: ``Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of any tax increase.'' Yet the only reason ObamaCare was found constitutional, the primary reason that Chief Justice Roberts--joining with Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan, along with Sonia Sotomayor--upheld the individual mandate is under Congress' taxing authority.…
Share
More from Aaron Schock
I thank the chairman. I would just say so much has been said I am not sure I will need 3 minutes. Obviously, I am here to speak in support of a measure that I introduced in this body last July that passed by a 2 to 1 majority. That means…
It is important that we give employers and individuals the certainty that their taxes will not increase by over $500 billion in the short term.
Nearly 160 million Americans receive health insurance coverage from their employers. Before Obamacare, employers were free to tailor their benefit plans to meet the needs of their workers. Once Obamacare was enacted, however, employers…
I am just wondering, from your perspective as that Federal employee, did you seek any legal counsel or legal opinion on whether or not you could go ahead and not implement a portion of the law passed by Congress?





