Raúl Labrador: “The safety of Idaho’s children cannot be an afterthought to runaway profit or technological advancements. We will hold…”

Some people are mad. … Because this office was being allowed to be used as a political weapon, (bill critics) don’t like it.

The Yes statement reflects the sponsors’ own initiative language, and the No statement reflects Idaho law as it stands today.

It was costing the states millions of dollars to litigate these cases, so in the end, it ended up just being better for the state.

Water is the lifeblood of Idaho, and my office will protect the water rights of Idahoans who depend on it.