on page 12, as you read this, you will note that it does state in parentheses--and this is very important, ``pursuant to criteria and procedures also provided in the mandate legislation.'' In other words, we do not leave this at the discretion of an agency. The agency itself will be determined by the authorizing committee. They will so state, which Federal agency will be dealing with this. In that legislation also, I say to the Senator, they will choose one of those two options. If they choose the option that states that should a subsequent appropriations bill not provide full funds, then that authorizing committee in its legislation is going to specify to that agency the criteria upon this scaling back. If they were to choose the other option, which is should the subsequent appropriations bill not provide the funds, then, again, based on the criteria as outlined by the authorizing committee, under those directions that agency would then so state. But it would be, again, at the direction of the authorizing committee in legislation that would then have to be passed by Congress. It does not in any way leave that to the discretion of the Federal agency.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the role of authorizing committees in determining agency funding and discretion.
Share
More from Dirk Kempthorne
I recently created the Department of the Interior Task Force to study climate change, because of its possible effects on our ability to be good stewards of wildlife, national parks and other landscapes, as well as our responsibility to…
Thank you for your letter of September 8, 1997. I want to assure you nothing has changed regarding my enthusiasm for the Enhanced Training in Idaho (ETI) initiative. The 366th Wing at Mountain Home Air Force Base is an important component…
nearly fourteen years ago President Reagan signed P.L. 98-244, an act to establish the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation as a charitable, nonprofit corporation of the United States specifically to further the conservation and…
I want to report that there are some members who believe the proposed substitute amendment #2892 sets a new standard for environmental remediation before the Air Force can relinquish the withdrawn lands back to the Bureau of Land…





