What we do not want to do, Mr. Chairman, is, we do not want to include a provision in this bill that will put scientific debate in the middle of personnel issues for the Federal Government. We do not want to put the results of scientific research, we don't want to take that out of the grasp of debate by policymakers for fear of retaliation by scientists and researchers who are doing work for the Federal Government. Mr. Chairman, this is good public policy to have this amendment, to take this section out of the bill; and I would urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
Bill Sali: “What we do not want to do, Mr. Chairman, is, we do not want to include a provision in this bill that will put scientific…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to scientific debate and personnel issues in federal government.
Share
More from Bill Sali
under Democrat leadership, the year 1993 witnessed the greatest tax increase in American history, until recently. Just 3 months into this new Congress, the Democrats have shown their vision for America with a more than $400 billion budget…
this motion is a straightforward one and one that I hope we can all support. Because the underlying bill is a permanent authorization of appropriations for this regional program, it is suitable that the Secretary of the Interior should use…
Today Members of Congress faced two budget resolutions. The choice is a clear one between bigger, more expensive and more intrusive government versus fiscal discipline based on key priorities. Now, fiscal discipline is hard, which is why…
H.R. 2467 honors the life of Frank J. Guarini in naming a post office for him in his hometown of Jersey City, New Jersey. Frank J. Guarini, a former Congressman and prominent public figure, has dedicated his life to serving his country and…





