I appreciate the interest of the gentleman from South Dakota (Mr. Thune) in this issue and his willingness to consider some middle ground on this divisive matter. Our States have so much in common, yet there clearly are differences on this issue. Nonetheless, I do think it is worth considering those areas of the master manual debate where we do agree and work together toward an answer that would satisfy the concerns of upper and lower basin States. I do not expect this to be an easy task as we all know but would welcome the gentleman's input in the process, and I am willing to work with him to consider various options.
Tom Latham: “I appreciate the interest of the gentleman from South Dakota (Mr. Thune) in this issue and his willingness to consider…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing collaboration on water management issues between upper and lower basin States.
Share
More from Tom Latham
I wish to speak on the point of order. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Iowa is recognized.
I reserve a point of order on the gentleman's amendment. The Acting CHAIR. A point of order is reserved. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…
The purpose of the amendment is to provide funding for Navy operations that might be affected by new and existing wind turbines. Upgrades to air traffic control to address Navy requirements resulting from the construction of wind farms are…





