Political Quotes

Tom Latham: I thank the gentleman for yielding. And I appreciate very much what's going on and the reduction of spending. I'm just…

On the recordFebruary 18, 2011
I thank the gentleman for yielding. And I appreciate very much what's going on and the reduction of spending. I'm just very concerned that this is not really a thoughtful way of doing it, that if we're after waste, fraud and abuse in our budget, this is going to cripple us as far as finding out where those places are. It will continue to fund items, lines in the budget that have waste, fraud and abuse and will not eliminate those. And also, when you look at just the transportation portion, I think the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. Olver) brought the point up too, but this would, in fact, stop air traffic control for a period of weeks. And I don't think many of us here would like to see our airports close down for several weeks because we don't have air traffic control. And that's exactly what would happen.
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa
Source
govinfo.gov
Feb 18, 2011

Editor's note · Context

The speaker expresses concerns about budget cuts affecting air traffic control and the identification of waste in spending.

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

I appreciate very much the gentleman raising the issue. I think we should remember, this is an appropriation bill. It is a funding bill. It is not an authorizing bill. This is an issue that should be dealt with by the committee of…

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2014

I have great appreciation for the gentleman's point. The report was very shocking as far as the transparency and how some of these grants have been given. I am in a position where I must insist on being consistent in opposing all…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I reluctantly rise in opposition to the amendment. I very much understand where the gentlewoman is coming from with the tremendous needs that we have today in infrastructure, to have some of this money being diverted to other uses. I…

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation