Political Quotes

Tom Latham: I think you have hit a fundamental point, and that is is the Government a servant to the people, or as it appears today…

On the recordMay 2, 1995
I think you have hit a fundamental point, and that is is the Government a servant to the people, or as it appears today, that role has reversed, and almost the people today are servants of the Government? It is wrong. The Government is here only to serve the people. It is a free country. Talk about regulatory relief, in my district wetlands is a huge issue, where today we have people from the Government coming out and delineating a small pocket or pothole in a farm that has been in production for 90 to 100 years, and their forefathers--my own farm has been in our family for 105 years. A lot of that ground was hand tilled, dug by hand 80 or 90 years ago. Now someone is coming in and telling us how we can and cannot use that land, because somebody somewhere in Washington or wherever says that that eighth of an acre there is an official wetland. By some of the definitions today, over half of my congressional district in 1993, the flood year, could have been a permanent wetland by their definitions. It is absolutely outrageous, and I am very proud of the fact that we put the pressure on the administration to finally get a moratorium as far as wetlands delineation.
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa

Editor's note · Context

Discussing government regulation of wetlands and its impact on farmers in his district.

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

All this would do is limit the employees of HUD, and it would do nothing to the PHA employees. PHA employees are not HUD employees; and all you are doing is limiting funding to HUD employees, so it would have no effect as far as the PHAs…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I wish to speak on the point of order. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Iowa is recognized.

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation