Political Quotes

Tom Latham: Woman, again, I oppose the gentlelady's amendment. This bill provides $45 million for housing counseling--the same as…

On the recordJune 26, 2012
Woman, again, I oppose the gentlelady's amendment. This bill provides $45 million for housing counseling--the same as last year and $45 million more than in fiscal year 2011. HUD just reorganized into the new Office of Housing Counseling. I would say that before we give additional resources to HUD's Housing Counseling, we need to make sure HUD has the capability to effectively implement this program. I think they ought to be able to walk before they run here. Housing Counseling agencies are still complaining of the painstaking bureaucracy involved in applying and receiving these funds. On the other hand, people could get housing counseling from many government sources, including NeighborWorks. {time} 2210 NeighborWorks gets funding out the door quickly, has extensive metrics ensuring the proper use of the funds. We increased NeighborWorks by $10 million over last year. We need HUD to do this thing right. So until they can prove to us they could, taking funding from HUD's salaries and expenses would not be an effective use of government resources. Again, Madam Chair, I would urge a ``no'' vote. I yield back the balance of my time.
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 26, 2012

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2014

First of all, I want to say thank you to Speaker Boehner and Mr. Hoyer for the kind words earlier and to also express my appreciation to my counterpart here, Mr. Pastor, who has been such a great partner through this whole process. It has…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

We would be happy to accept the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation