It seems to me that pre-disaster mitigation is cheaper than paying the damages afterwards.
Tom Latham: “It seems to me that pre-disaster mitigation is cheaper than paying the damages afterwards.”
Editor's note · Context
Latham argues for the cost-effectiveness of pre-disaster mitigation programs.
Share
More from Tom Latham
I thank the gentleman from Arizona for yielding. Yes, we were aware of it. We have been advised by the DOT of the ramifications of this amendment in the revised form. That is why I rise in opposition. It is DOT's concerns we are raising.
I withdraw my reservation, and I rise in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Iowa is recognized for 5 minutes.
I reserve a point of order on the gentleman's amendment. The Acting CHAIR. A point of order is reserved. The gentleman from Minnesota is recognized for 5 minutes. {time} 1645
I reserve a point of order on the gentleman's amendment. The Acting CHAIR. A point of order is reserved. The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.





