On the recordMarch 12, 2013
But the President proposed and insisted it be in the Budget Control Act, but you haven't talked to him about the ramifications.
Source
congress.govTom Latham: “But the President proposed and insisted it be in the Budget Control Act, but you haven't talked to him about the…”
Editor's note · Context
Latham questions the lack of communication with the President regarding budget cuts.
Share
More from Tom Latham
Jun 9, 2014
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…
Jun 9, 2014
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…
Jun 10, 2014
I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…
Jun 9, 2014
The gentleman makes a very compelling argument, and we would accept the amendment.
Other voices in this conversation
