Political Quotes

On the recordJanuary 25, 2011
I want to thank my colleague, Mr. Loebsack from Iowa, for joining me in this resolution and his lead cosponsorship on this. The Medal of Honor, like the gentleman just referred to, has quite a history with Iowa in that back on December 9, 1861, Iowa Senator James W. Grimes first introduced the concept of a medal of honor to promote the efficiency of the Navy at that time. And later on, there was another bill to also recognize people in the Army for their outstanding service and heroic actions. I was very pleased back in 2002 to introduce a bill; I don't know how many people were aware at the time, but there was never a Medal of Honor flag. We had in Jefferson, Iowa, a memorial for Captain Darrell Lindsey, who was a Medal of Honor winner from World War II; and a man named Bill Kendall, an Army veteran from Jefferson, felt that it was inappropriate that we didn't have a flag there. So I introduced legislation. Bill Kendall from Jefferson, Iowa, actually designed what is the Medal of Honor flag today, and I am still so appreciative of what he did. And now at the ceremony down at the White House when the Medal of Honor was given to this next great Iowan to see that flag there, it made me feel very, very proud of the contributions that so many people, Iowans, people all across this country have made and sacrificed for a country for the kind of honor they deserve.
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa

Editor's note · Context

Speaker discusses the history and significance of the Medal of Honor and the creation of the Medal of Honor flag.

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

If the gentleman doesn't take much time, we will accept the amendment. Mr. DeFAZIO. I agree. And Mr. Westmoreland will also be brief. This is extraordinarily important, and I thank the Chair for his indulgence and his support. We, in the…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

All this would do is limit the employees of HUD, and it would do nothing to the PHA employees. PHA employees are not HUD employees; and all you are doing is limiting funding to HUD employees, so it would have no effect as far as the PHAs…

govinfo.gov
Dec 8, 2014

First of all, I will say ``thank you'' to Mr. Simpson--a great, great friend--for doing this this evening; to Mr. Nunes, who is still on the floor here; to Steve King and Dave Loebsack, who were down here. I am not going to sing--we will…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation