On the recordJune 9, 2014
The reason I objected is we weren't sure as to what the amendment was, and we would accept the amendment. Mr. DeFAZIO. We won't take much time if the gentleman just would allow me 1 or 2 minutes.
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from Tom Latham
Jun 9, 2014
The amendment is very well intended, but I make a point of order. Mr. Chairman, the amendment proposes to amend portions of the bill not yet read. The amendment may not be considered en bloc under clause 2(f) of rule XXI because the…
Jun 9, 2014
I thank the gentleman from Arizona for yielding. Yes, we were aware of it. We have been advised by the DOT of the ramifications of this amendment in the revised form. That is why I rise in opposition. It is DOT's concerns we are raising.
Jun 9, 2014
The gentleman's amendment would shut down Amtrak. I concede that Amtrak could be more efficient. However, it has made significant improvements in this area recently, and it is moving in the right direction. The bill provides $340 million…
Jun 9, 2014
I certainly understand the issue the gentleman is trying to get at. {time} 2245 I must oppose the amendment because I think there are some unintended consequences. As far as the way the amendment itself is written, in effect you are…
Other voices in this conversation
