Political Quotes

Tom Latham: I appreciate the intent of the amendment of the gentleman from Iowa. The gentleman introduced legislation that would…

On the recordJune 26, 2012
I appreciate the intent of the amendment of the gentleman from Iowa. The gentleman introduced legislation that would require States to enact harsher penalties for reckless drivers who pass stopped school buses, and this amendment complements that legislation and, I think, sends a very, very important message. The legislation named in memory of the little girl the gentleman spoke about from Iowa who was killed so tragically, this is extremely important, I think, to raise the profile. I would hope that the authorizing committee in conference on the highway bill would take this into consideration and act on this very provision. As a cosponsor of the act, I commend the gentleman's effort and would accept the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Braley). The amendment was agreed to. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will read. The Clerk read as follows: highway traffic safety grants (liquidation of contract authorization) (limitation on obligations) (highway trust fund) Contingent upon reauthorization, for payment of obligations incurred in carrying out the provisions of 23 U.S.C.…
Said by
Tom Latham
Iowa
Source
govinfo.gov
Jun 26, 2012

Share

More from Tom Latham

Jun 9, 2014

I reluctantly rise in opposition to the amendment. I very much understand where the gentlewoman is coming from with the tremendous needs that we have today in infrastructure, to have some of this money being diverted to other uses. I…

govinfo.gov
Jun 10, 2014

I must rise in opposition to this amendment also. While I appreciate the gentleman's efforts to further reduce spending, this account is already $6 million below the enacted level from last year and over $30 million below the President's…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I make a point of order that the amendment proposes a net increase in budget authority in the bill. The amendment is not in order under section 3(d)(3) of House Resolution 5, 113th Congress, which states: ``It shall not be in order to…

govinfo.gov
Jun 9, 2014

I appreciate very much the gentleman raising the issue. I think we should remember, this is an appropriation bill. It is a funding bill. It is not an authorizing bill. This is an issue that should be dealt with by the committee of…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation