I will just obviously be very brief. But the gentleman was talking earlier about opposing this amendment because it creates busy work for the agencies. What about the busy work of the small businesses to comply with these mountains and mountains of regulations? And the previous speakers have said the biggest reason that people are not hiring today is because of the cost of regulations. I would ask for this amendment to be passed. I yield back the balance of my time. {time} 1945 The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Latham). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the ayes appeared to have it.
Tom Latham: “I will just obviously be very brief. But the gentleman was talking earlier about opposing this amendment because it…”
Share
More from Tom Latham
I reluctantly rise in opposition to the amendment. I very much understand where the gentlewoman is coming from with the tremendous needs that we have today in infrastructure, to have some of this money being diverted to other uses. I…
I make a point of order that the amendment proposes a net increase in budget authority in the bill. The amendment is not in order under section 3(d)(3) of House Resolution 5, 113th Congress, which states: ``It shall not be in order to…
All this would do is limit the employees of HUD, and it would do nothing to the PHA employees. PHA employees are not HUD employees; and all you are doing is limiting funding to HUD employees, so it would have no effect as far as the PHAs…
We would be happy to accept the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time.





