I ask my friend from Wyoming, I just heard the Senator say this is the authorization process and he did not want to interfere with the appropriations process. Again I ask the Senator, does not your amendment wipe out the appropriations we made last year? Does it not invade the appropriations process? We appropriated this money last year. If I am not mistaken, the Senator's amendment wipes that out. The Senator just said this was authorization, not appropriations, but if you read the amendment, it wipes out our appropriations. Am I reading it wrong? It says 'notwithstanding any other provision of law.' I ask the Senator, does not this invade the $1.2 billion we already appropriated? I will be glad to yield to the Senator.
Tom Harkin: “I ask my friend from Wyoming, I just heard the Senator say this is the authorization process and he did not want to…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the implications of an amendment on previously appropriated funds during Senate debate.
Share
More from Tom Harkin
will the Senator from Tennessee yield? The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.
I wish to pay tribute and to extend my thanks to an extraordinary individual, Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, who has served on my staff, with one small interruption of service, for a decade. Jenelle came to my staff in the summer of 2003 as a…
The Biden Administration has taken some important steps to right those wrongs, discharging student loans for borrowers who were not able to graduate.
first let me thank my friend and colleague for his lifetime characteristic which is being very gracious and very generous in his remarks. Chuck Grassley and I have served together since 1974. I like to tell people that in 1974, that was a…





