And that shield is money. There are going to be other amendments that might focus on one thing or another. My second question for the Senator: Is it his belief, from all of his long experience involving education, that we have to look at the whole? Each one of these parts isn't a whole. It is important to increase Pell grants, but that alone won't solve it. It is important to increase title I, but that alone won't solve it. It is important to increase funding for individuals with disabilities, but that alone won't solve it. Is it the contention of the Senator that this has to be put together?
Tom Harkin: “And that shield is money. There are going to be other amendments that might focus on one thing or another. My second…”
On the recordApril 4, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for a comprehensive approach to education funding.
Share
More from Tom Harkin
Nov 17, 2014
Again, I thank the Senator for this clarifying question. Under this bill, State plans must include a certification that there are in effect in the State requirements that include the establishment of a grace period that allows homeless…
Apr 15, 2015
We do think that the decisions about what is safe should be made by science and not by politics.
Nov 17, 2014
I wish to announce that the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions will to meet on November 20, 2014, at 10 a.m. in room SD-430 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, to conduct a hearing entitled ``Hearing on the nomination…





