One argument against lowering interest rates is that our unemployment levels are already low. Some say that our current rate of unemployment at 4.5 percent is too low, companies cannot find workers and will be forced to pay more, hurting their profits, hurting the economy. Businesses have surprised many economists by creating multiple ways to improve efficiency. Of course, more can and should be done. I believe there is room for additional job growth. Companies have also been effective at finding new employees who were not actively looking for work and were, therefore, not counted as unemployed. We need economic growth to continue in order to improve wages, to bring still more people into the labor force, to give those working part time the chance to work full time, and to provide opportunity for those on welfare, and for those who have entered the workforce at the bottom rung, to start moving up the ladder. With only those looking for work counted as unemployed, there are still millions of others not counted as unemployed who could be brought into the workforce. As difficult as it may be to find workers now, this will be viewed as a small problem compared to a serious economic downturn, a recession, and deflation. Again, if inflation should start to accelerate we can always apply the brakes and whatever inflation may have occurred can be reduced. But to forever limit our growth to a preset limit blocks Americans from the opportunity of reaching their full potential.
Tom Harkin: “One argument against lowering interest rates is that our unemployment levels are already low. Some say that our current…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of interest rates and unemployment levels on economic growth.
Share
More from Tom Harkin
I thank the Presiding Officer. I thank my friend and colleague from Connecticut for his very excellent, profound statement and for taking a leadership position on this very crucial issue. It is obviously well known I am retiring in 3…
I introduced the Protect Student Borrowers Act with Senators Durbin, Warren and Murphy--and I want to thank Senator Warren for her great leadership on this issue and many other issues.
We do think that the decisions about what is safe should be made by science and not by politics.
I too want to spend a couple of moments reflecting upon my long friendship and association with Senator Carl Levin from Michigan. Much has been said this morning about Carl the person and the Senator. Let me say this: I don't know of…





