Well, wait a second. I do not think the answer is yes. What GAO said is NATO enlargement could entail costs in addition to those countries in the Partnership for Peace, for example, others who may not be invited to NATO but because of the enlargement of NATO there may be other costs incidental and associated with it. That is what they are saying. Does the Senator say absolutely there will be no other costs associated to PFP countries when NATO is enlarged?
Tom Harkin: “Well, wait a second. I do not think the answer is yes. What GAO said is NATO enlargement could entail costs in addition…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the potential costs of NATO enlargement during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Tom Harkin
I wish to announce that the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions will to meet on November 20, 2014, at 10 a.m. in room SD-430 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building, to conduct a hearing entitled ``Hearing on the nomination…
Again, I thank the Senator for this clarifying question. Under this bill, State plans must include a certification that there are in effect in the State requirements that include the establishment of a grace period that allows homeless…
We do think that the decisions about what is safe should be made by science and not by politics.
Our institution's performance, measured by student withdrawal and default rates, is one of the best of any examined, and it appears that students are faring well at this degree-based college.





