I want to know if those on the other side who oppose this are going to offer an amendment that says, no; if a woman is seeing an OB/ GYN, if she is having a difficult pregnancy--this may be a specialist in whatever the difficulty might be. But then the woman's employer changes HMOs and drops the doctor. Right now they can refuse to pay that specialist. She would have to go to someone else and start over. Doesn't it make common sense that she should at least be able to see that specialist through the end of her pregnancy, the birth, and have that same specialist see her? That is common sense. I question out loud, will someone on the other side offer an amendment to disallow that? Fine, if they want to do that, if that is their opinion. I want to see how many people vote against something such as that. That is just common sense.
Tom Harkin: “I want to know if those on the other side who oppose this are going to offer an amendment that says, no; if a woman is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing healthcare access for women during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Tom Harkin
I wish to pay tribute and to extend my thanks to an extraordinary individual, Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, who has served on my staff, with one small interruption of service, for a decade. Jenelle came to my staff in the summer of 2003 as a…
I support the nomination of Charlotte Burrows to be a commissioner of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, or EEOC, and David Lopez to continue to serve as the agency's general counsel. These are two eminently qualified nominees…
I thank the Senator for those kind remarks. Let me say again what a pleasure it has been to work with the Senator from Tennessee for the last few years. In the last couple of years, we brought a lot of meaningful legislation through our…
will the Senator from Tennessee yield? The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from Iowa.





