the gentleman and everybody on that side voted for two pieces of legislation to not repeal it but to take care of it. And what the gentleman has said and the other gentleman has said about law enforcement and other areas is just not true. What this does, if this gets through, all that ground will stay under the management plan it now has, which allows for law enforcement, which allows for cars. It does not make any changes whatsoever.
John Hansen: “the gentleman and everybody on that side voted for two pieces of legislation to not repeal it but to take care of it.…”
Editor's note · Context
Defending legislation related to land management and law enforcement during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Hansen
H.R. 3928 would direct the Secretary of the Interior to assist the University of Utah by making a grant to the University of Utah Museum of Natural History in Salt Lake City, Utah, to help pay for the Federal share of the costs of…
H.R. 4682, introduced by the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Murtha) would revise the boundary of the Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site. The Allegheny Portage Railroad, located in southwestern Pennsylvania, was the first…
H.R. 2109, introduced by the gentlewoman from Florida (Mrs. Meek) would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a resource study of Virginia Key Beach Park in Miami, Florida, to determine the suitability and feasibility of…
I rise today to commend my home State of Utah for hosting, in the words of NBC sportscaster Dick Ebersol, ``far and away the most successful Olympics, summer or winter, in the history of the games.'' The State of Utah and their citizens…





