I rise to speak on H.R. 220, providing appropriations to the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development and various independent agencies. While I have some concern about several provisions in the bill, the bill is technically consistent with the Budget Resolution and complies with the Budget Act. H.R. 2620 provides $85.4 billion in budget authority and $88.1 billion in outlays for fiscal year 2002. The bill does not exceed the VA-HUD subcommittee's adjusted 302(b) allocation. Accordingly, the bill complies with section 302(f) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, which prohibits measures that exceed the reporting subcommittee's 302(b) allocation. This bill designates $1.3 billion in emergencies, which triggers an automatic increase in the corresponding levels in both the Budget Resolution and the statutory caps. The appropriation is for FEMA Disaster Relief Operations in response to the recent tropical storm in Houston, Texas. It is not entirely clear that the designation is necessary because the Budget Resolution provides ample resources for emergencies. With this said, the emergency designation is clearly permitted under existing law. H.R. 2620 also provides $4.2 billion in advanced appropriations for the Section 8 Housing Certificate Program, which will be counted against the levels established in next year's Budget Resolution.
Jim Nussle: “I rise to speak on H.R. 220, providing appropriations to the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing appropriations for veterans and housing in relation to H.R. 220.
Share
More from Jim Nussle
we reserve to close. The Acting CHAIRMAN. The gentleman from South Carolina is recognized for 10 minutes.
these are the same arguments we heard before we reformed welfare and unlocked 30 million Americans from the dependency of government. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart).
I thank the gentleman. We will have more discussion about this during the debate on his amendment. I withdraw my reservation. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Without objection, the new form of the amendment is considered as read. There was no…
you know it is interesting that the distinguished minority whip indicated that all of the spending has been Republican spending in the last 6 years. Mr. Chairman, I had a chance to go and check the gentlemen's Website, and, interestingly…





