obviously I support the gentleman's opposition to the motion. Let me just point out as well in support of his opposition that not only would it delay the military construction bill by sending it back to committee, because of the fact that we are going on recess as an example, it would postpone a decision about this because the gentleman, interestingly enough, complained about a technicality earlier. There is a technicality in this motion that Members need to be aware about. It is the words ``promptly,'' and ``promptly'' means when we get around to it a little bit later, not forthwith, which means right away. What we did yesterday is more than promptly. It happened yesterday. It is over in the Senate. They can take advantage of that opportunity and pass that bill immediately, not in some form later on. So I appreciate the gentleman's opposing this method even though I know his heart may not be in it as much as mine has to be in this instance.
Jim Nussle: “obviously I support the gentleman's opposition to the motion. Let me just point out as well in support of his opposition…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a motion related to the military construction bill.
Share
More from Jim Nussle
you know it is interesting that the distinguished minority whip indicated that all of the spending has been Republican spending in the last 6 years. Mr. Chairman, I had a chance to go and check the gentlemen's Website, and, interestingly…
I yield myself 4\1/2\ minutes. Mr. Speaker, it is interesting. The Democrats come to the floor and they want us to only remember two parts of a very large story. They want us to remember back in May now of 2001. It is kind of an…
I am trying to find where we are taking away picnics now. I am looking for picnics in here. I may not vote for this now. I did not realize we were taking away picnics, of all things. My goodness. How could we do that, my friend. I would…
I just am shocked. There is no scientific evidence, Mr. Chairman, but we are understanding that the gentleman, and that there might even be in the Democratic substitute tax cuts? Why would we do such a thing when there is no science, when…





