Mr. Speaker, while I certainly enjoy the philosophical discussion of budget process and budget enforcement with maybe the best of them, the fact of the matter is that this is a real vote and you are either going to vote yes to prevent automatic sequestration of Medicare or you are not. It is either a vote to allow OMB, or not even allow, to force OMB for automatic sequestration of Medicare or you are not. So a vote in favor of this bill prevents Medicare cuts. A vote against this bill or a vote even for that matter for the motion to recommit allows Medicare cuts, and it is that simple. So we will have a lot of time to talk about budget process for many years, weeks, months to come, but the fact of the matter is that this is a real bill. It has real consequences, and therefore it should be passed.
Jim Nussle: “Mr. Speaker, while I certainly enjoy the philosophical discussion of budget process and budget enforcement with maybe…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a vote to prevent Medicare cuts.
Share
More from Jim Nussle
except the gentleman forgot Osama bin Laden, and I thank the gentleman for that. Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the very distinguished gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Ryan), a member of the committee, so maybe he can answer some of the…
Yes, they are. In fact, we put into the budget an emergency reserve fund for the purpose of funding that war, the same way Mr. Spratt does, the exact same amount.
If men were angels, quoting James Madison, we would not need all of these controls.
at a time when nearly all Federal agencies are facing the need for spending discipline, it is imperative that we apply restraint to ourselves as well--to the operations of Congress itself. This bill--the Legislative Branch Appropriations…





