I know the gentleman will most likely have the last word on this, so I will make my comments brief; but I have a slightly different take on who might be responsible here. The rules of the House may not permit me to be quite as specific as I might like, but there are two bodies that have to have a budget, have to complete a process in order to be successful. This body passed a budget. The gentleman may not agree with it. It may be difficult. These are difficult times. But at least the House of Representatives has completed its work on a budget and did so back before the deadline of April 15. If there was a better budget, a better proposal, a better outline and a better plan, we have yet to see it. It has yet to materialize in either the gentleman's caucus or the other body, as it is referred to. That may happen, but until then I would at least suggest that there may be more responsibility to go around than where he pointed the responsibility in his comments here just a moment ago.
Jim Nussle: “I know the gentleman will most likely have the last word on this, so I will make my comments brief; but I have a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget responsibilities during a House debate.
Share
More from Jim Nussle
I am transmitting a revised table for the current level status report published in the Congressional Record on February 1, 2006. As published, the table that compares the current levels of discretionary appropriations for fiscal year 2006…
Export-Import is self-funding and has generated income for the Treasury since 1992.
Yes, they are. In fact, we put into the budget an emergency reserve fund for the purpose of funding that war, the same way Mr. Spratt does, the exact same amount.
these are the same arguments we heard before we reformed welfare and unlocked 30 million Americans from the dependency of government. Mr. Speaker, I yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart).





