That is correct. But secondly, if you do not have concern for competitive equity, you put the taxpayer at greater risk because you will have weaker standards. You also drive a system that we will be putting all assets of a given kind of industry within a governmentally privileged institution. That is what the trends are. So this is both a taxpayer protection and free market protection. {time} 1430
James A. Leach: “That is correct. But secondly, if you do not have concern for competitive equity, you put the taxpayer at greater risk…”
On the recordOctober 26, 2005
Source
govinfo.govShare
More from James A. Leach
Oct 26, 2005
First I would like to make clear that what the amendment does is say, ``which may include'' consideration for what the gentleman has just indicated.
Jun 7, 2006
I thank Mr. Faleomavaega for his wondrous comity on this and so many issues, and I yield back the balance of my time. The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. Culberson). The question is on the motion offered by the gentleman from Iowa (Mr. Leach)…
Jul 19, 2006
I am honored to yield to the distinguished chairman of the Middle East Subcommittee, the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Ros-Lehtinen), for such time as she may consume.
Feb 23, 2010
A citizenry that does not understand its unique heritage, as well as foreign cultures, will not benefit from the lessons of history.





