One aspect of this relates to an old-fashioned word used in the 19th century, not much in the 20th, and that is the word ``oligarchy.'' As systems of governance become based upon a few influencing the many, they are called oligarchies and they are not democracies. Democracy is what is at issue today. The second trend that is extraordinary is that our Founding Fathers thought of a system of governance in which people would be elected from various parts of the country and bring to Washington the background of that part of the country. But as campaign giving is nationalized, attitudes are nationalized, and what we are seeing is the nationalization of elections. Instead of people becoming first and foremost accountable to the people in their districts, they are becoming first and foremost accountable to the people that influence the people in their districts.
James A. Leach: “One aspect of this relates to an old-fashioned word used in the 19th century, not much in the 20th, and that is the word…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the influence of campaign financing on democracy and representation in Congress.
Share
More from James A. Leach
there are few certitudes in these complicated times. Anyone who was not conflicted in the original decision to invade Iraq or who does not see a downside to all courses of action today is not thinking. But I am hard pressed to believe…
today's debate should not be about the character of the gentleman from Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, whose service to his country is above reproach. It should also no be about a resolution introduced by one member ascribing it to the position…
first I would like to make clear that what the amendment does is say, ``which may include'' consideration for what the gentleman has just indicated.
I would only like to make one philosophical contribution to this debate, and that is that Dr. Borlaug has been awarded the Nobel Prize for the green revolution, the notion of pure science being used to expand the production of food crops…





