I would just like to make 3 quick points to clarify the Record. One, no one for reasons of poverty alone will be eliminated from public housing, only for violations of terms of the lease, such as criminal behavior. Second, the money in this bill is precisely the same as the administration requested. Third, we have to be very careful about this, but experience has shown, verified by experts as well as public consensus, that to concentrate the very poor alone in public housing is to condemn them to a kind of poverty segregation. Single dimension, lowest income housing simply has not worked anywhere in America, particularly high-rise housing. Finally, I would say that to object to reform is to endorse the status quo. This of all Federal programs is one in which there is virtual consensus that the failure rate has been very high.
James A. Leach: “I would just like to make 3 quick points to clarify the Record. One, no one for reasons of poverty alone will be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing public housing reform and its implications during a House floor debate.
Share
More from James A. Leach
Americans often measure history in Presidential cycles. When we look at the individuals who have served in the White House it is the conjunction of character and circumstance that defines and demarcates administrations. It would be…
I am honored to yield to the distinguished chairman of the Middle East Subcommittee, the gentlewoman from Florida (Ms. Ros-Lehtinen), for such time as she may consume.
let me say I may consider the Lantos-Shays alternative imperfect, but it represents a credible political balancing and is clearly preferable to the underlying bill. But listening to the debate over the past 2 days, I sense a lack of…
I would only like to make one philosophical contribution to this debate, and that is that Dr. Borlaug has been awarded the Nobel Prize for the green revolution, the notion of pure science being used to expand the production of food crops…





