I would only ask, as we look at this particular amendment that has been offered by the distinguished gentleman from California [Mr. Berman], two questions: Is it cheaper and more effective to advance the interests of the United States through international burden sharing, or is it cheaper and more effective to go it alone? The second question is, How can we, in times of trauma, ask others to serve with us if we refuse to serve with them? It is in this context that I think this particular amendment would add modestly to the bill and make it something that would be more acceptable to more Members of this body. But I would stress to everyone, this has become a flawed bill in the final measure. With great regret, I am going to have to vote against it.
James A. Leach: “I would only ask, as we look at this particular amendment that has been offered by the distinguished gentleman from…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to U.S. international leadership and burden sharing.
Share
More from James A. Leach
I think by perspective we should understand that there is no possibility all Americans can agree all the time or appreciate equally all aspects of the American arts. But what we all can do is respect honesty and quality and first amendment…
today's debate should not be about the character of the gentleman from Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, whose service to his country is above reproach. It should also no be about a resolution introduced by one member ascribing it to the position…
Americans often measure history in Presidential cycles. When we look at the individuals who have served in the White House it is the conjunction of character and circumstance that defines and demarcates administrations. It would be…
That is correct. But secondly, if you do not have concern for competitive equity, you put the taxpayer at greater risk because you will have weaker standards. You also drive a system that we will be putting all assets of a given kind of…





