as many of the new Members ran on a promise of bringing change to Washington, one of the key areas of that new direction was the responsibility of securing this Nation. In July of 2004, the bipartisan 9/11 Commission issued a comprehensive series of recommendations and urged this body and the leaders of this country to take prompt action to implement those recommendations and make us safer. Today, in just the second week of our majority, the Democratic House of Representatives will pass legislation that will address the 9/11 recommendations and make the American people safer and more secure. Just yesterday, the 9/11 Commission Vice Chair, Lee Hamilton, a former Member of this body, stated the bottom line is that if this bill, H.R. 1, is enacted, funded and implemented, then the American people will be safer because it carries out the recommendations of the commission. I am proud to be part of this effort to implement those recommendations, and I am proud because that was a promise made to the Members of our constituents last fall. Action on this critical issue of securing our Nation is long past due. The citizens of our great Nation are calling for change. In the area of national security, the time for change has arrived.
Bruce L. Braley: “as many of the new Members ran on a promise of bringing change to Washington, one of the key areas of that new direction…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of implementing the 9/11 Commission recommendations for national security.
Share
More from Bruce L. Braley
Providing access to broadband services around the country, and especially in rural areas, increases the strength of local economies and improves the quality of life for American families.
I would say that the centerpiece of our work in the 112th Congress was passage of the Veterans Retraining Assistance Program as part of the VOW to Hire Heroes Act.
I think one of the things that is often lost on the American people is that a disproportionate share of our military comes from rural America, but it is not met by a disproportionate share of services in those rural populations.
when you talk about the trade-off, Mr. Roenigk, between growing green beans in Iowa and corn in Iowa, you are talking about a false choice





