I rise to oppose House Concurrent Resolution 178, the conference report on the budget resolution. The fiscal year 1997 budget resolution appears to be an improvement over the budget proposed by the majority party last year in that it scales back proposed Medicare spending reductions from $288 billion over 7 years to $168 billion over 6 years, and scales back the proposed Medicaid spending reductions from $186 billion over 7 years to $72 billion over 6 years. House Concurrent Resolution 178 also reduces the size of a proposed package of tax cuts from $345 billion over 7 years to something between $122 and $176 billion over 6 years. However, these changes do not mask the fact that the budget embraces assumptions that will reduce dramatically the role of the Federal Government in guaranteeing medical coverage for the poor, maintaining affordable health coverage for seniors, and in expanding educational opportunities for all. With respect to Medicaid, House Concurrent Resolution 178 embraces structural changes to the program that will transform it from an individual entitlement into a block grant.
Patsy T. Mink: “I rise to oppose House Concurrent Resolution 178, the conference report on the budget resolution. The fiscal year 1997…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing House Concurrent Resolution 178 regarding the fiscal year 1997 budget resolution.
Share
More from Patsy T. Mink
this year we will be working on the reauthorization of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, known as TANF. It was a rewrite of the welfare law that we had previously enacted called Aid to Dependent Children. One of the major…
I rise today to ask all of my colleagues to vote for H. Con. Res. 385, which calls upon the Secretary of Health and Human Services to conduct or support research on certain tests to screen for ovarian cancer and to ensure that Federal…
I heard a commentator the other day on a talk show say that next to the civil rights, title IX has probably made the most difference in this country in opening up opportunities, and I certainly have to agree that a small effort, a deep…
Mr. Speaker, there are many others who wanted to be here, but because of the advance of the time that we had informed the offices that they would be heard, many are not here. But I wanted to say that the most important message that I…





