the politics of loopholes has angered the general public. We need to stop procrastinating about changes that need to be made in our campaign financing. There are some large loopholes you could run a truck through without violating the law. If we can't agree on all the changes and reforms that are on the table for discussion, at the very least we can close the loopholes. Today, candidates for Federal office may obtain unlimited, unsecured loans from banks to finance their campaigns. Banks are able to bankroll their chosen candidates by obtaining a mere signature on a loan form without obtaining security for repayment, as is customary in their normal course of business. I call upon this House to investigate how many unpaid, unsecured loans there are to Federal candidates. When do these unpaid loans, secured by no assets, become an illegal contribution by a bank? If a bank is not permitted by law to make a contribution to a Federal candidate, how is it allowed to make an unsecured loan? And what happens when this loan is not repaid? Who gets stuck? All the bank's depositors? I have introduced a bill, H.R. 783, that prohibits all Federal candidates from making an unsecured loan. This bill also requires that such unsecured loan be repaid within 90 days after the enactment of the bill, and in the interim, prohibits candidates who currently have an unsecured loan from accepting personal funds from a board member or officer of the bank who holds the loan.
Patsy T. Mink: “the politics of loopholes has angered the general public. We need to stop procrastinating about changes that need to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing campaign finance reform and the issue of unsecured loans to federal candidates.
Share
More from Patsy T. Mink
I rise in support of H.R. 3801, the Education Science Reform Act of 2002. H.R. 3801 marks a significant step forward in the Congress' effort to improve the research, evaluation, and technical assistance focus of the Department of…
I rise today to thank the Members of the House Committee on International Relations for including $13.5 million for the East-West Center in the FY2002 State Department Authorization bill. An amendment to delete this funding was…
I have great occasion to celebrate this moment and to tell my colleagues what a wonderful person Shirley Chisholm was. There was something about her, her gate, her mannerism, the smile that went across her face. It just sort of electrified…
What I think this House needs to bear in mind as we consider this very, very important amendment is that the structure that we have put forth is a formula which really puts the Federal Government into the position of elaborating very…





