It goes exactly against the best scientific information, which says the best nurturer of the child is the mother of the child. So to break up this relationship in a forceful manner by mandating a law that requires this seems to me an abrogation of our public policy stances, which has always been to support the family. We always stand up and say, ``I am for the family,'' and we debate how much we excel in terms of your beliefs in the family and mine. And yet when it comes to something like welfare reform, we somehow feel that we can abrogate these fundamental beliefs, and I think that is wrong.
Patsy T. Mink: “It goes exactly against the best scientific information, which says the best nurturer of the child is the mother of the…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about welfare reform and its impact on family structures.
Share
More from Patsy T. Mink
To state that legal permanent residents should only be allowed to exercise their constitutional right of free speech when they become U.S. citizens displays a dangerous misunderstanding of constitutional law.
I heard a commentator the other day on a talk show say that next to the civil rights, title IX has probably made the most difference in this country in opening up opportunities, and I certainly have to agree that a small effort, a deep…
The bill must originate in the House of Representatives. We must be given the opportunity to debate and amend this measure.
What I know is bad enough. It includes an across-the-board cut of 0.97%, and it undermines the Administration's class-size reduction initiative.





