I yield to no one in this House in my respect for the gentleman from California [Mr. Lantos] and his strong support for human rights. The record is well known. We are colleagues in the Human Rights caucus. I find myself, unfortunately, in a position of rising to disagree on this issue. This is a question of free speech. We are acting in an institutional capacity here today, and I urge all of you who are listening, all of you who are observing today and are going to vote on this, we are being asked to do this as an institution. The first amendment says that Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. The universal declaration of human rights, which I also subscribe to, and we are members of the United Nations, everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression. This right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers. When one stands up and says it is not free speech, it is. Free speech means driving bad speech out with good speech. It means taking the responsibility in meeting the obligation of resisting tyranny and intolerance everywhere we find it, and we do have the right to do that, the obligation to do that as Members of Congress.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the importance of free speech and human rights in Congress.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
Not only has Hawaii been able to achieve near universal coverage, they have done so with no negative impact, no negative impact on the business community. Rather, we in Hawaii have achieved a positive business growth, decreased…
I can assure you that the Ethics Committee, the Parliamentarian and the Speaker of the House of Representatives have assured me that, if you can consume it on the premises, it's okay.
This bill is an enabling bill. It establishes a process. The core of this bill assures that a Native Hawaiian Government has the same powers and sovereign immunity as other native governments, and this is consistent with the history of the…
I think the answer from the most practical point of view is the passage of the Hawaiian Homes Act of 1921. The Congress obviously recognized that there was a distinctive entity in the category of Native Hawaiians as a logical extension of…





