I find myself discussing this not as a question of partisanship, not as a question of Democrats versus Republicans. I do not find myself in a position, Mr. Chairman--and I refer again to my good friend, the gentleman from California, and some of the others I have discussed this with--of looking at this even as a question of winners and losers. On the particular issue, I think we are ill-served by this contract. This is not a question of loser pays in regard to clients and lawyers. This is a question of whether we are losing as freedom-loving individuals. Some of my libertarian friends that I have on the other side of the aisle find themselves stumbling for an explanation to me as to how they can be for this. This is the ultimate defense of the individual against the State.
Neil Abercrombie: “I find myself discussing this not as a question of partisanship, not as a question of Democrats versus Republicans. I do…”
On the recordMarch 7, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a contract on individual freedoms.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
Sep 17, 2015
I would just like to ask people who have this political orientation towards the president, respect us here in Hawaii, respect his mother and father. Respect the people that I loved and the people that I knew and the little boy who grew up…
Apr 15, 2014
We regard the Pacific Ocean as not separating us in the Asian Pacific region, but connecting us in the Asian Pacific region.
Feb 23, 2010
This bill is an enabling bill. It establishes a process. The core of this bill assures that a Native Hawaiian Government has the same powers and sovereign immunity as other native governments, and this is consistent with the history of the…





