I think that before we cast any vote we should think about the national security implications. In today's Washington Post, to go no further than the most contemporary moment, Mr. Speaker, ``U.S. is big market for firms owned by the Chinese military.'' The People's Liberation Army is now being called in some quarters the People's Liberation Army, Incorporated. We find ourselves in circumstances where military-related firms now are working in our seaports, they are involved in shipping. The military is pervasive throughout China. It is against our national security interests to go forward with most-favored-nation status for China at this point. It reminds me of the 1960's. We find ourselves walking down a path toward confrontation with China which need not occur if we are able to see today that we should not grant most-favored-nation status.
Neil Abercrombie: “I think that before we cast any vote we should think about the national security implications. In today's Washington…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing national security concerns regarding granting most-favored-nation status to China.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
In support of our substitute amendment, the amendment ensures that the Native Hawaiian governing entity will have the same governmental authorities and sovereign immunity of other native governments. The Abercrombie amendment, the…
Hawaiian activists have argued that revenue from the ceded lands should be used exclusively for the benefit of ethnic Hawaiians.
I presume when you say political balance you don't mean those who are for civil rights and those who are against it?
This bill would also provide a structured process to address the longstanding issues resulting from the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii.





