I do not dispute any of that. As I said, I have great respect for the gentleman. However, we battle every day in the Committee on National Security for those millions of dollars. We are not able to maintain our own troops. We are not able to train our own troops. We are not able to equip our own troops. We are not able to maintain quality of life for our own troops. I am quite willing, in fact I will state that I am prepared today to work with the gentleman to try to accomplish this, but the gentleman is making a case for having joint consideration by the Committee on National Security and the Committee on International Relations so that our own forces can be adequately funded as well. I thank the gentleman for his kind indulgence.
Neil Abercrombie: “I do not dispute any of that. As I said, I have great respect for the gentleman. However, we battle every day in the…”
On the recordMarch 30, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding and support for military troops in the Committee on National Security.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
Feb 23, 2010
I think the answer from the most practical point of view is the passage of the Hawaiian Homes Act of 1921. The Congress obviously recognized that there was a distinctive entity in the category of Native Hawaiians as a logical extension of…
Apr 15, 2014
We regard the Pacific Ocean as not separating us in the Asian Pacific region, but connecting us in the Asian Pacific region.
Sep 17, 2015
I would just like to ask people who have this political orientation towards the president, respect us here in Hawaii, respect his mother and father. Respect the people that I loved and the people that I knew and the little boy who grew up…





