I observed that Mr. Bishop was looking directly at me when he recited, with a look that I can only determine as ``gleeful,'' he cited the razorback sucker and the bonytail chub. I am not sure whether I was being categorized by him in the sucker category or the chub category, or he was gazing at me metaphorically. Do you suppose he might be able to answer that for me.
Commenting on a colleague's remarks during a debate.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
I think the answer from the most practical point of view is the passage of the Hawaiian Homes Act of 1921. The Congress obviously recognized that there was a distinctive entity in the category of Native Hawaiians as a logical extension of…
I can assure you that the Ethics Committee, the Parliamentarian and the Speaker of the House of Representatives have assured me that, if you can consume it on the premises, it's okay.
This is the message of Aloha. This is the message that our diversity in this world should define us rather than divide us.
Disasters like Hurricane Sandy know no ideology. There is no political points to be scored.
Other voices in this conversation
