With all due respect to my good colleague and friend, Mr. Hastings from Washington State, I have to oppose this amendment because it has no precedent--or indeed any place I believe in Federal law that has been in place for well over 150 years as that law relates to Native governments. Under our Constitution, the citizens of the United States are the only citizens who are authorized and recognized as having a right to have a say in the laws which govern our Nation, be they Federal statutes or amendments to our Constitution. In a similar manner, the citizens of one State in our Union do not get to weigh in on the laws of another State or any proposed amendments to another State's constitution. Put simply, they cannot vote for changes in the law of a State for which they are not citizens. It goes without saying that foreign governments have no role to play in the formulation of the laws of the United States or the U.S. Constitution. All of these fundamental principles have in their foundation the fact that each government is a separate sovereign, and only the citizens of that sovereign government may determine what governmental powers and authorities that sovereign government may exercise. It is no different for native governments in the United States.
Neil Abercrombie: “With all due respect to my good colleague and friend, Mr. Hastings from Washington State, I have to oppose this…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker opposes an amendment regarding the rights of Native governments in federal law.
Share
More from Neil Abercrombie
And I would just like to ask people who -- who have this political orientation towards the President, respect us here in Hawaii. Respect his mother and father. Respect the people that I loved and the people that I knew and the little boy…
If it is, then why are we giving racial preferences in countless numbers of Congressional enactments and laws as well as Supreme Court decision recognizing the special relationship, the trust responsibility that Congress has under the…
We don't want to go to the Supreme Court eventually and then have someone say I know what you want to do, but and that is legitimate because the recognition of indigenous people is, in fact, something that is constitutionally established…
This bill would also provide a structured process to address the longstanding issues resulting from the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii.





